ONLINE
STORE
"ASK THE BACH MAN"
FORUM
PARTS, SERVICE,
& INFORMATION
CATALOGS AND
BROCHURES

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2017, 02:28:52 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Please read the Forum Code of Conduct   >>Click Here <<
+  Bachmann Message Board
|-+  Discussion Boards
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  Test picture post
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 Print
Author Topic: Test picture post  (Read 22919 times)
scottychaos


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2007, 05:38:18 PM »

Looks like someone removed the 250 pixel limit!  Grin Grin

lets test it out:













Logged

scottychaos


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2007, 05:45:25 PM »

woo hoo!
the 250 limit is gone!  Grin

thank you to whoever removed it!  Grin

now the only potential problem is that if there is no limit, people can post gigantic images which mess up the page...usually done out of honest ignorance about resizing, but I still think there should be a limit..like 640 to 800 or so..
normally I would never post a 900 pixel wide image like I did in the post above..I just did that to test it out!  Wink

If no limit is automatically applied, I guess we will just have to try to educate the people that post massive photos...hopefully it wont happen too often.

hmmm..maybe there is a limit set and its larger than 900!
just for the sake of science, im going to post a massive pic just to test the limit, if there is one...normally this shouldnt be done!  Wink
please keep pics at 640 to 800 maximum!

lets see..3,518 pixels wide should do it:



*edit*

ah ha! there IS a size limit!
I dont know what it is, its obviously somewhere between 900 and 3,518 pixels..
thats good then!
I wont bother to test it anymore...

thanks for fixing the "250 pixel problem!"  Grin Grin

Scot

« Last Edit: February 04, 2007, 05:48:00 PM by scottychaos » Logged

Terry Toenges


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2007, 06:40:37 PM »

Scott - Just curious as to why the track is raised off the roadbed. Is this on purpose?
Logged

Feel like a fourfouro.
lanny

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 04, 2007, 07:35:41 PM »

Hi all,

Just testing to see if I can still post photos.



lanny nicolet
Logged

ICRR Steam & "Green Diamond" era modeler
scottychaos


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 04, 2007, 07:39:16 PM »

Scott - Just curious as to why the track is raised off the roadbed. Is this on purpose?

Terry,
are you referring to this photo?



there IS no track!  Wink
the engine is sitting on a railing/fence.

Scot
Logged

lanny

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 04, 2007, 07:40:08 PM »

Great,

I can ... but my images are larger in image shack where I keep them stored ... less than 800K, but they used to post larger than this. any suggestions?

Thanks,

lanny nicolet

PS ... that's an AMB ICRR 'Iowa division' caboose kit I recently finished.
Logged

ICRR Steam & "Green Diamond" era modeler
scottychaos


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 04, 2007, 07:41:01 PM »

woah..very weird..now the 250 is BACK!  Huh? Huh? Embarrassed Tongue

must be some teething issues with the forum..
very odd.
should hopefulyl settle down soon..

Scot
Logged

msowsun

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 04, 2007, 08:49:34 PM »

Logged
msowsun

View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2007, 08:49:53 PM »

Like I said before, you have to edit your post and remove the 250 limit.

width=250 height=187

« Last Edit: February 04, 2007, 08:52:22 PM by msowsun » Logged
scottychaos


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: February 04, 2007, 09:03:01 PM »

Like I said before, you have to edit your post and remove the 250 limit.

width=250 height=187



hmmm..interesting.
well maybe that works, but its certainly not the best way to do it! Wink
the "250 limit" was actually gone for a brief time this afternoon..photos did post full-size with no editing necessary..then the 250 limit REappeared..so perhaps someone is still tweaking the forum..

Scot
Logged

Tom Hogan


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2007, 09:32:29 PM »

test: (bb code) @railimages.com 706x530 pixels...displayed larger before...exact same type of post! (62.3 kb)

« Last Edit: February 05, 2007, 09:34:44 PM by Tom Hogan » Logged

Tom Hogan


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2007, 09:36:06 PM »

same info as last post.....but RailImages calls this a "direct link"
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/IMAG1178.JPG
« Last Edit: February 05, 2007, 09:40:00 PM by Tom Hogan » Logged

Tom Hogan


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 05, 2007, 09:37:29 PM »

again, same info as the last post, RailImages call this a  "Linked Thumbnail"
« Last Edit: February 05, 2007, 09:39:21 PM by Tom Hogan » Logged

Rich R
Guest
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2007, 10:38:23 PM »

Yup! That's what I'd call it as well.
It works as such at least.  Cool

Rich R
Logged
Hoople

I like BIG steam.


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2007, 10:48:27 PM »

Nice pix everyone!

Tom, I like your layout.
Logged

-Hoople-

Modeling UP, SP, and D&RGW in colorado between 1930 and 1960.

GIVE US HARRIMAN STEAMERS BACHMANN!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!