Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => Large => Topic started by: YellowHillsCentral on July 29, 2007, 12:28:04 AM

Title: K27
Post by: YellowHillsCentral on July 29, 2007, 12:28:04 AM
Yeah I know this topic is a little old but i need to know, is bachmann naking a K27? and if possible (probably not though, when will it be released? and how much will it cost???

Thanks a ton for your help,
ShayLudlow
Title: Re: K27
Post by: tlnibert on July 29, 2007, 07:17:55 AM
All I've been hearing is rumors, but I was also told at the show in York Pa.,it would be a 2-8-2, and it would be extra special.  Bachmann has came from toys to very fine models.
My 2-8-0 is the favorite of all my engines.  I do wish Bachmann would produce their own track, I know it would be done right.
Tom
Huntington, WV
Title: Re: K27
Post by: ollie on July 29, 2007, 09:10:31 PM
Well I know atleast one who is waiting for a Mudhen....
Got a place ready for it.... 
Title: Re: K27
Post by: the Bach-man on July 29, 2007, 11:41:46 PM
Dear All,
Anonymous bloggers notwithstanding, nothing has changed regarding this project- I will post details when cleared to do so.
Best to all,
the Bach-man
Title: Re: K27
Post by: vic on July 30, 2007, 05:34:28 PM
Suffice to say, if Bachmann follows suite with previous releases, we wont see this until Christmas, at the very earliest...

...of course that could be xmas 2008 :o ;D
Title: Re: K27
Post by: Steve Stockham on July 30, 2007, 08:54:26 PM
  It'll show up when it's ready and the B-Man will be the first to tell us! This one is going to be special so I don't mind waiting! If there was ever an engine worthy to be "anticipated" it's this one! ;D
Title: Re: K27
Post by: Charlie Mutschler on July 31, 2007, 10:56:57 AM
Steve, you are quite right - this is the one worth anticipating.  Consider how the K-27 will look with a string of the new tank cars - the RGS oil trains before the Ames slide cut the line and re-routed the Farmington crude oil traffic off the RGS. 

Patiently anticipating
Charlie Mutschler
Title: Re: K27
Post by: Kevin Strong on July 31, 2007, 11:48:41 AM
Quote from: Charlie Mutschler on July 31, 2007, 10:56:57 AM
...Consider how the K-27 will look with a string of the new tank cars...

I like that thinking.

Consider how a long string of steel hoppers would look with an EBT mikado on the front!!! ;D ;D ;D

(Sorry, had to be done.)

Later,

K
Title: Re: K27
Post by: japasha on July 31, 2007, 12:26:38 PM
Kevin, I have to agree with you. An EBT Mike would be nice. Then again, a slight variation to match a White Pass and Yukon Mike would be nice as well. Everyone else, these are big locomotives for 1:20.3.  Let's see, I need at least 20 hoppers for one of those plus one of those cabooses. Almost 1/3 of my loop outside.

The EBT ran like a small eastern mainline. Most narrow gauge fans are unaware of that. Now a nice version of M-3 would be nice to go with it.
Title: Re: K27
Post by: Curmudgeon on July 31, 2007, 01:15:22 PM
Or, just think of what it will look like cut down to a 2-8-0.
Or, even two mechanisms under a Kitson or Garratt.

I could even fit a WP&Y GE shovelnose shell over it.
We could paint them up in Snoopy colors and make a fortune!


Nah.

Just keep Laurel and Hardy away from it for a while longer.
Title: Re: K27
Post by: Steve Stockham on July 31, 2007, 08:44:14 PM
Heh, heh, heh..... nah! I don't think we have to worry about that bunch over here! ;)
Title: Re: K27
Post by: leftyfretguy on July 31, 2007, 10:35:32 PM
OK,
I have been waiting a while to bring up the idea of an EBT mike again but this thread is already headed that way anyway ;D
I have a few questions about the k27 that relate to a possible future EBT release.
How was the k27 class chosen first?  Was it by size? By number of engines in that class? age? everybody's favorite type?  If an EBT engine were to be produced, what would come first.  I have thought a few different ways about this, 12 is the smallest and I suppose "cutest" but there was only one of that size. 14 and 15 are very close to eachother and most people are familar with them because they are/were/will be the work horses of the excursion trains.  But 16, 17 and 18 are also very similar so you could produce them and get the most out of the design process.  Does that make sense?  I guess what I mean is you make the same model just put different numbers on it as opposed to building a new model.
If we post a request here everyday for an EBT mike will it speed the process up? :P
I gotta stop reading these threads, Im starting to think a model of 464 might fight in with my stuff