http://www.ares-server.com/Ares/Ares.asp?MerchantID=RET01229&Action=Catalog&Type=Product&ID=84272
Not sure if you've seen these yet, but they were in the current catolog...
:)
Eh, it is not what I expexted, was more looking forward to seeing the actaul model rather than the default.
Dusten
It looks really great, but it would look better if it were RGS. :-X :-X
Wouldn't look right, wrong type of ten wheeler.
I think what he was trying to say is the Tweetsie engine looks nice and we are happy...but there would had been sheer elation in On30/On3 had Bachmann made the RGS 20 ;D
Royce Wilson
The RGS 20 would have gone with the rail truck ;)
Royce Wilson
Quote from: Royce Wilson on September 27, 2008, 07:07:17 PM
The RGS 20 would have gone with the rail truck ;)
Royce Wilson
Yes!!
Quote from: Royce Wilson on September 27, 2008, 07:05:05 PM
I think what he was trying to say is the Tweetsie engine looks nice and we are happy...but there would had been sheer elation in On30/On3 had Bachmann made the RGS 20 ;D
Royce Wilson
Yep.
My bad, sorry for the rude comment. LONG Day of irritation.
Rock ON!
Dusten
Sure folks, I would have joined in to cheer if there was a RGS No.20,
but the new 4-6-0 is a great looking engine anyway-sure love it!!! :) :) :)
Well done Bachmann - canĀ“t wait to see one running on my layouts
Tom