Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => HO => Topic started by: winjie on December 01, 2008, 03:34:26 PM

Title: Amtrak Continental versus the Amtrak Nor'easter
Post by: winjie on December 01, 2008, 03:34:26 PM
I see that the Amtrak Nor'easter is now at the hobby shops, I Prefer the Continental especially with Amtrak phase 3 scheme and the F40ph locomotives. It is really a sad that they are getting rid of the F40ph's I love those locomotives.
Title: Re: Amtrak Continental versus the Amtrak Nor'easter
Post by: jayl1 on December 01, 2008, 04:02:06 PM
The first ones were built in 1976. They have slowly been disappearing for years.  I recall seeing a photo of one that was converted to a "baggage car" with a roll up door on the side.  Yes, they were neat engines.  The Genesis engines and the Dash 8-40BPs are probably more fuel effecient + what are the maintenance costs on a 30+ year old locomotive?
Title: Re: Amtrak Continental versus the Amtrak Nor'easter
Post by: Paul M. on December 01, 2008, 09:57:34 PM
Amtrak's Oklahoma City - Fort Worth train the "Heartland Flyer" has an F40PH converted cab and baggage car. Railfans have nicknamed locos of this type "cabbages".
Title: Re: Amtrak Continental versus the Amtrak Nor'easter
Post by: Conrail Quality on December 01, 2008, 10:34:13 PM
Amtrak also runs cabbages on the Boston-Portland (ME) Downeaster, the Portland (OR)- Vancouver Cascades, and many of the various Chicago-based city-to-city runs. They're really quite useful, and Amtrak got them with only minimal expense.

Timothy