Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => On30 => Topic started by: shayman on September 20, 2007, 11:18:01 AM

Title: comparison shot of 4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 by shayman
Post by: shayman on September 20, 2007, 11:18:01 AM
 Hi All
I to cannot wait to see the new 4-4-0 engine. Their has been a lot of talk about the size and I have put some pictures together. Some of the pictures I did not take and would like to say to the ones who took them thanks for takening them.
(http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/Bachmann_show_over_all.jpg)
(http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/Backmann_show_4-4-0.jpg)
(http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/2-8-0_2-6-0.JPG)
(http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/Tenders_side_by_side.JPG)
(http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/2-8-0_tender.JPG)
You can see how the lengths run by looking at the pictures and the ruler.
I believe that the 4-4-0 is 2 1/2 inches shorter than the 2-8-0 and around 1 1/4 inches shorter than 2-6-0.
The 2-8-0 is around 13 inches long.
Happy Railroading
  Shayman
Title: Re: comparison shot of 4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 by shayman
Post by: peterherron on September 21, 2007, 10:46:45 AM
Great work, Shayman!  Thanks for the great pictures.
Title: Re: comparison shot of 4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 by shayman
Post by: ole on September 22, 2007, 12:11:20 AM
I sure hate it when I told myself that I have all the locos I can possibly use or want and then this 4-4-0 comes along. I am going to get at least one and hopefully sooner than later.
Is there any information out there about the recommended minimum track radius? Same as the 2-6-0?
Title: Re: comparison shot of 4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 by shayman
Post by: the Bach-man on September 22, 2007, 09:29:39 AM
Dear Oe,
Yes, 18" radius should be fine.
Have fun!
the Bach-man
Title: Re: comparison shot of 4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 by shayman
Post by: Frisco on November 04, 2007, 06:04:26 PM
Great Pictures !!!!!!! :)