Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => HO => Topic started by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 09:07:28 AM

Title: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 09:07:28 AM
Two club members who have helped me a bunch on the VT&P have different theories.  One favors soldering sections of flex track together before making a long curve, as in a helix, and the other doesn't.  Which do you suggest?
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: cmgn9712 on May 28, 2007, 09:27:48 AM
The purpose of soldering is to keep the curve smooth at the joint. Otherwise it is very easy to end up with a kink which will cause problems
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: wade on May 28, 2007, 09:28:23 AM
I sodder mine. It keeps continuity up and the kinks out. What are the benefits of not soddering?
Wade
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: ap0317ah on May 28, 2007, 10:24:22 AM
I also solder mine i belive as the layout ages the solder helps the continuty
of eletric supply more than the joints

Tom
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: lanny on May 28, 2007, 10:38:24 AM
Gene,

I personally recommend soldering first. You will have to cut several of the ties off the flex track at the solder joints as you work the long, long straight, soldered track into the radius curve you need, but you can add wood ties later to those gaps. I am 'fairly adept' at soldering, but have never had success, even with wide radius curves (36"+) when I laid the flex track first and then tried to solder a smooth curve.

best wishes on getting good track work on your helix.

lanny nicolet
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 10:54:11 AM
Thanks.  I'm waiting for the rebuttal  ;D  I reuse the cut off ties by filing down the plate and slipping the tie under the track.  Works fine. 
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: Atlantic Central on May 28, 2007, 10:54:43 AM
Gene,

I solder almost all my rail joints. It goes back to what I ws taught by my father on my first layout. It solves a mumber of problems before they happen.

And, it is the solution to smooth curves with flex track. I use insluated rail joiners, not just gaps, and I leave a few joints unsoldered on the straight for expansion.

With the new modules, the plan is to solder everything on the module and let the module joints also be the expansion joints.

Sheldon
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 02:52:54 PM
It's becoming a majority and makes sense to me.  Obviously some expansion joints will be necessary.  OTOH,  I've hit a major snag.  I messed up horizonal at the beginning of the helix, even using a degree finder, and I have one serious hump which will mean removing the horizonal supports and putting new ones in.  Fortunately, I have plenty of wood and some of the horizonal supports can be reused in different places.
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: lanny on May 28, 2007, 03:59:00 PM
Hi again Gene,

I should have mentioned 'expansion joints' and glad others did mention that issue. Living in the Midwest, during the summer especially, even with a dehumidifier and an air conditioner, high humidity can work some real 'havoc' if there are not some expansion joints, especially in a layout the size you are building.

lanny nicolet
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 04:42:30 PM
I've taken expansion joints into consideration.  As noted, no rebuttal yet.
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: Craig on May 28, 2007, 08:52:23 PM
I bench-solder 2 or 3 sections of flex track and then lay the assembly. On curves, I make sure the joints are staggered substantially to prevent kinks and ensure correct gauge. It is much better to have one solid rail adjacent to a soldered joint on a curve. You can do the same thing on a straight section but I've never had to.

Craig
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: Conrail Quality on May 28, 2007, 09:02:28 PM
Well, since no one has offered any rebuttal at all, I may as well do a few. First, it is easier to not solder, then decide to solder later, then vice-versa. Second, you could (theoretically) sustain seriuos injuries soldering. Not so with rail joints. Third of all, prototypicality. Do railroads, even railroads as wealthy as the Chesapeake & Ohio waste money installing continuous welded rail in minor sidings and branch lines? From the sound of your layout, there are going to be at least a few of these. Just so you can't claim there were no rebuttals...
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: Steve Magee on May 28, 2007, 09:42:24 PM
Yes, solder - just remember to solder the rails when they are straight, then curve them to suit. Leave rails on straights unsoldered to allow the fishplates to take care of expansion if you like, but solder feeders from the track bus to each of these rails.

Depending on your environment, you may find humidity variations in the underlying benchwork to be more of a problem, esp so if your train room is air conditioned and you start out with lumber that has not been kiln dried or seasoned.

Steve
Newcastle NSW Aust
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 28, 2007, 09:51:09 PM
CQ,
I'm only concerned with soldering in such places as the helix and major turns.  Sidings are generally straight and I'll leave places for expansion there and on the straights
The building is well insulated and I have yet to turn the AC on, though I know that time is coming. 
Oops - yes the AC was on, back in January when we had a church party on the Feast of the Ephiphany and the building got blessed.  Twelveth Night and all that.
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: r.cprmier on May 31, 2007, 07:08:50 AM
To all concerned here;
Flex track usually has one side fixed into the tie system, and the other side is movable-slidable, if you will.

When laying flex track, the best approach is a common-sensical one.  The sliding side goes on the outside of the radius; hence, I would avoid soldering anything until it is spiked in place, joiners, checked for proper easements, transitions, smooth operation, etc etc etc.

Much has been written on the correct ways of layng flex track.  I think more emphasis should be placed upon whatever base the track will be resting on, as any lumps, bumps, etc will be telegraphed right up to the rails, causing derailments, wriggling along, etc; resulting in wailing and the gnashing of teeth...and possibly the clang of brass as a now scrap engine hits the deck...

To my way of thinking, if you can, do check each piece carefully, before any installation for any defects; then plan each install, trying to foresee aforehand, any problems that might arise.

Gene mentioned expansion joints:  try and keep those out of the radii if at all possible.  Do them only on straight sections.  Also, don't use any more than is absolutely neccessary.

I solder my joints and joiners, taking care to solder correctly, using heat sinks even on plastic tie system, as this can distort, and also cause bad trackwork.  Wire connections take place far from joints, and if done neatly as well as properly (I use #18 stranded) it will not readily show up and will remain solid for a long time.

The track and turnout work in my "high detail" sections are products from Jack Parker's "Central Valley works"-and I am pretty finicky about that in particular; most of that is being done separately in the shop downstairs, where I can position each module to advantage, as well as have access to a complete shop; thus maintain as high a standard as I want.

I will never tout my layout as a showpiece of master trackwork-but my experience with crummy trackwork resulting from half-baked proceedures are what I try to apply to my thinking now, and hopefully, it will pay dividends in the long run.   By the way, nothing is foolproof, and perfection is a fool's errend, but maybe my past shortcomings and disasters can help you too. 

RIch
;

 
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: Atlantic Central on May 31, 2007, 08:22:36 AM
Rich,

Great thoughts and well presented,

I just have one comment/question?

What brand, brands or rail codes of flex track do you usually use?

It has been my experiance with Atlas code 83 flex that both rails move relatively easily. I have incountered brands that are as you discribe as well brands that are very stiff on both sides.

My point being that the idea of one rail fixed and one moveable does not seem to be universal or even consistant within one manufacturer.

The newer track from Atlas, made in China seems somewhat that way, while its US made predecessor was very slippery on both rails.

Sheldon
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: SteamGene on May 31, 2007, 09:19:18 AM
I've ncountered sections of Atlas code 100 flex track where the side that should slide easily doesn't and has to be worked a bit to loosen up.  It's not very common, but annoying when discovered.  It appears that it's just one small section that causes the binding.
Gene
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: pdlethbridge on May 31, 2007, 09:30:05 AM
If You let the rail slide a little, not completely nailed, this would help with expansion problems. The rails in a helix should be soldered. That is the last place you want to have a problem. Do it once and do it carefully, and you'll never have a problem.
Title: Re: solder or not
Post by: r.cprmier on May 31, 2007, 01:19:43 PM
If You let the rail slide a little, not completely nailed, this would help with expansion problems. The rails in a helix should be soldered. That is the last place you want to have a problem. Do it once and do it carefully, and you'll never have a problem.

If you recall, I said avoid joints on radii; however sometimes it cannot be avoided, helixes being one case.  Do keep that sliding rail on the outside, though.  The minute you start switching sides, or worse-laying random, you will rapidly come to grief untold.  Be judicious when making those expansion cuts on that helix, though.  I don't know what radius you are using, but the greater the arc, the better possibility that the above will work admirably and leave you alone.

I use either Walthers, Railine (when I can find it)and Atlas code 83 on main lines, only because it is the most user-friendly out of all makes-in my opinion.  I have not used code 100 in a long while, except for staging yards and other places where it won't show.  I have no gripes about it quality wise; whatever grabs you should be what you use.  I am using code 70 in my yard areas and will use it in the carfloat operation, as it will look a sight better than anything else; 55 is a bit too small to suit my fancy.

Gene; just for the hell of it, sometime check out Central Valley's line of tie strips, and turnout kits.  You may find them an interesting possibility, accentuated  by the "in-between" sizes of the turnouts.

Rich

PS: anyone in Ct going to the prototype meet in Canton this weekend?  See you there, if you are.