Dear All,
Do any of you own, or have access to, any of the four crossings listed?
(Bachmann N 30, 45, 60 or 90 degree crossings.)
Please measure their length, vertical face of roabed to opposite face, to the nearest 1/16" or mm.
Measure the length of any included fitter straights, also.
Let us know how packaged, e.g. display box, blister card, etc.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
Post edit to omit misinformation.
90° crossing
Measuring with calipers in inches;
The crossing measures 1.125 (+.005, -.000) across all four surfaces, for all intents and purposes it is 1⅛" and square.
In millimeters it measures 28.575 (+.127, -.000).
There is no embossed part number on the crossing.
The four filler pieces that are included with the 90° crossing are embossed as 2 29/32" ST.
They are not embossed with a part number.
Here's the weird part, they actually measure 1 29/32".
With calipers they measure from a low of 1.906 to a high of 1.913.
For planning 1 29/32' will do.
Joe
Sometime ago, I purchased the Bachmann assorted straight section track pack.
Included in the pack are two 4½" straight pieces (N4829A-1), two 2¼" pieces (N4829A-2) and two 1⅛" pieces (N4829A-3).
With calipers they check out as advertised.
I am just wondering out loud, why the "oddball" 1 29/32" pieces are included with the 90° crossing?
It will be interesting to see what the filler pieces included with the 3 other crossings measure out to.
James,
Thanks for all your hard work. 1-1/8" crossing, plus four 1-29/32" fitter straights.
Here's the one picture that I trust:
http://www.normstrainworld.com/images/BACH44841.jpg
All the rest are scans of a Bachmann catalog picture (of an HO crossing) re-labeled as the 44841 N crossing.
To build a 90 degree Figure 8, the four straight legs are each "radius minus half the crossing length".
So, 11-1/4"R - 9/16" = 10-11/16".
Combine available straights and fitters to get as close to 10-11/16" as possible.
For a 90 Degree x 19" Radius Figure 8,
19"R - 9/16" = 18-7/16"
Combine available straights and fitters to get as close to 18-7/16" as possible.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
60° crossing
With calipers the crossing measures 1.552" or 39.43mm across opposite vertical faces.
In layman's terms that's .010" short of 1 9/16".
For planning let's call it 1 9/16 (1.5625)".
The embossed part number on the bottom of the crossing is N4842-B.
The four filler pieces included with the crossing are embossed N 1⅛ ST.
The P/N is N4829A-3.
They measure out as advertised 1⅛" (1.125 + .004 - .000).
Bachmann has re-released this crossing as having longer legs whereas the filler pieces roadbed will not need to be trimmed by the modeler.
The new ones do not come with the filler pieces.
I do not have the newer version.
(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/3070/img1389b.jpg)
(http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/2470/img1390c.jpg)
Dear James,
Again, thanks for your work and dedication.
Calculating the straight lengths for the 60 degree Figure 8s requires a different (more complicated) formula.
I gotta run, will get back to you with it later.
Joe
Dear James.
Math:
xdeg = crossing angle degrees
xlength = crossing length
R = curve radius
strleg = straight leg (1 of 4) length
strleg = R X [tangent (xdeg/2)] - xlength/2
In the 60 degree crossing case, 60/2 = 30, and tan(30) = 0.57735
Degrees of curves needed for each side = 360 - xdeg = 360 - 60 = 300 degrees per side
300 degrees/30 degrees per section = 10 sections per side, or 20 total 11.25" radius curves.
300 degrees/15 degrees per section = 20 sections per side or 40 total 19" radius curves.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
Edit: added brackets [ ] to equation, corrected tan (30) value to 0.57735
Joe,
Please double check my math.
11.25r x .57735 = 6.49518 - .78125 = 5.71393
And
19r x .57735 = 10.96965 - .78125 = 10.1884.
I maybe wrong yet again.
Thanks for all your input to this forum, the next time a figure 8 question comes up, maybe we can direct them here, to this thread.
I think I've got it but please correct me if I don't
Sincerely,
James in fl
Dear James,
My humble apologies. You are correct, typo error on my part. I'm glad you caught it. I will go back and correct it.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
The 30 degree crossing measures 2.582 across the opposite faces.
No extra track filler pieces are included with the crossing.
In the 30 degree crossing case, 30/2 = 15, and tan(15) = 0.26794
Degrees of curves needed for each side = 360 - xdeg = 360 - 30 = 330 degrees per side
330 degrees/30 degrees per section = 11 sections per side, or 22 total 11.25" radius curves.
330 degrees/15 degrees per section = 22 sections per side or 44 total 19" radius curves.
Strleg 11.25r X .26794 = 3.01432 - 1.291 = 1.72332
Strleg 19r X .26794 = 5.09086 - 1.291 = 3.79986
The 45 degree crossing measures 1.744, across the opposite faces. let's call it 1.750.
No extra track filler pieces are included with the crossing.
In the 45 degree crossing case, 45/2 = 22.5, and tan(22.5) = 0.41421
Degrees of curves needed for each side = 360 - xdeg = 360 - 45 = 315 degrees per side
315 degrees/30 degrees per section = 10.5 sections per side, or 21 total 11.25" radius curves.
315 degrees/15 degrees per section = 21 sections per side or 42 total 19" radius curves.
Strleg 11.25r X .41421 = 4.65986 - xlength/2 (.8750) = 3.78486
Strleg 19r X .41421 = 7.86999 - xlength/2 = (.8750) = 6.99499
Someone, (Joe?) please double check the math.
Dear James,
Thanks for the crossing measurements.
Your calculations look good.
A couple of notes or exceptions:
1a.) Unless you want to cut an 11.25"R - 30 degree curve in half, the 45 degree crossing would only be good for the 19"R curves.
1b.) You could add a single 19"R curve to the middle of each 11.25"R loop, but that would throw off the straight leg calculations a bit. (The next trigonometry challenge?...)
2.) Now comes the hard part: Finding fitter straights that add up to leg lengths you calculated.....Fortunately loop ends tolerate straight-leg slop pretty well.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
Some thoughts...
Several posts back I questioned the "oddball" sections included with the 90° crossing. Now I see where they can come in handy, for instance with the 45° crossing using 19r curves.
A 5in straight plus the "oddball" 1.90in. straight gets it pretty close.
Using eight of them with the 30° and 19r also works out pretty close, closer than any other combination.
Problem there is that they are only available with the 90° crossing and you'd have to buy 2 crossings to get the eight pieces.
Also you will need at least two (four would be better) assorted track packs as they include 2ea.of the smaller sizes.
Going that route, there is still going to be some slop on most all possible combinations of filler pieces with all 4 crossings.
So let's say $50 for four assorted track packs plus another $30 for two 90° crossings... that puts the cost at a good quality dremel tool with ~ 50 accessories.
Or you could spend 3 bucks for a competitors track saw and spend the rest on fodder track pieces which could be cut much closer than using manufactured short lengths.
Just thinking out loud...
P.S. Thanks again Joe for all your input into the forums and the trig lessons.
Good Luck
James in fl
Dear James,
The mixed radii recipe mentioned in 1b.) above (mostly 11.25"R x 45 degree Figure 8 ) calculates to 4-7/8" straight leg length.
1 ea 45 degree crossing,
4-7/8" straight or fitter straights
5 ea. 11.25" x 30 degree curves
1 ea. 19" x 15 degree curve
5 ea. 11.25" x 30 degree curves
4-7/8" long straight or fitter straights
Attach end to crossing.
repeat for other side.
Recipe may work with 5" straights.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
Joe,
Yep, that's (1b) yet another case where having 8 pieces of the 1.906 section would get you closer. (x2 + 1⅛ = 4.937) leaving you only .062 over, rather than .125 over using the 5 in. straight.
I knew I needed to go back to the LHS for something. :)
Eventually I'd like to build and run on each scenario we have discussed above.
Figure 8 configurations using the new 17.5r 15° curves.
90° crossing;
360° - 90° = 270° per side.
270 / 15 = 18pcs. per side.
Strleg = 17.5 - .5625 = 16.9375. (4x).
60° crossing;
360° - 60° = 300° per side.
300 / 15 = 20pcs, per side.
Strleg = 17.5 x .57735 = 10.103625 - .78125 = 9.322375. (4x).
45° crossing;
360° - 45° = 315° per side.
315 / 15 = 21 pcs. per side.
Strleg = 17.5 x .41421 = 7.248675 - .8750 = 6.373675. (4x).
30° crossing;
360° - 30° = 330° per side.
330 /15 = 22 pcs. per side.
Strleg = 17.5 x .26794 = 4.68895 – 1.291 =3.39795. (4x).
Someone please confirm/refute my trigonometry calculations.
Joe ?
Dear James,
I went back to the early postings in this thread and used your original caliper (length) measurements of the various crossings.
For the 17.5" Radius curves, I ended up with strleg lengths (4x) of:
90 degrees: 16.9375" or 16-15/16" (same).
60 degrees: 10.103625 - 0.776 = 9.327625" or 9-5/16"
45 degrees: 7.248675 - 0.872 = 6.376675" or 6-3/8"
My chart shows tan(15) = 0.26795 :
30 degrees: 4.689125 - 1.291 = 3.398125" or 3-13/16"
It's a little bit overkill to use that many digits. You could probably get away with 1/4" slop in those lengths.
It's nice to know what they should be, though.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Joe Satnik
Thanks Joe,
Overkill most definitely.
IMO rounding to 2 digits, behind the decimal,
should be OK.
Thanks again,
James in FL