Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => HO => Topic started by: Steam Freak on August 17, 2007, 09:26:43 PM

Title: #2472
Post by: Steam Freak on August 17, 2007, 09:26:43 PM
Hi Mr. Bachmann. I am wondering if there is any plans for making a Southern Pacific P-8, 4-6-2 like #2472:

(http://bill.srnr.arizona.edu/M&M/SP-P10.jpg)
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: Hoople on August 17, 2007, 11:48:08 PM
That is a good idea, I believe the P-8s were harriman standards, and would be applicable to UP and IC also.
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: the Bach-man on August 17, 2007, 11:59:08 PM
Dear Freak,
I'll pass along your request.
Have fun!
the Bach-man
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: Yukonsam on August 18, 2007, 10:34:01 AM
Hi
The P-8 is certainly a beautiful engine. Useful, as the class was used to pull fast freights too, but it is not a Harriman standard. Sorry.
The SP classes P-1, P-3 and P-5 were Harrimans.

But a non-USRA Pacific is always welcome, and I believe the P-8 could be a great stand-in for other Pacifics too, with another tender than the Vandy.

Regards, Yukonsam
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: Amtrak_Titan on August 18, 2007, 10:50:49 AM
 I would like to have Southern Pacific 2472 in HO.
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: Hoople on August 18, 2007, 02:49:07 PM
Even though it's not harriman, I wouldn't mind having it on my layout.

SP RULES!!!
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: RAM on August 18, 2007, 03:26:06 PM
On the sp 4-6-2s. Does the p in p-1 p-3 5 & 8 stand for pacific?
Title: Re: #2472
Post by: SteamGene on August 18, 2007, 06:04:15 PM
Yes, P for Pacific.  The AC class was for "Articulated Consolidation"  :D
Gene