Bachmann Online Forum

Discussion Boards => HO => Topic started by: billgiannelli on December 14, 2015, 06:42:30 AM

Title: code 100 vs 110
Post by: billgiannelli on December 14, 2015, 06:42:30 AM
what is code 110 vs 100?
I thought I understood what code 100 is but now I see code 110 on other sites.
is that used with code 100?
thanks
Bill
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: jbrock27 on December 14, 2015, 07:03:36 AM
Sure it is referring to HO scale track Bill?  Never heard of 110, except for referencing voltage or a N/S route on L.I.
Can you paste here?
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: TwinZephyr on December 14, 2015, 09:03:33 AM
Code 100 is a rail size.
Code 110 is a wheel tread size.
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: billgiannelli on December 14, 2015, 10:38:27 AM
Ah yes!
That makes sense!
thank you
Bill
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: jbrock27 on December 14, 2015, 12:22:20 PM
Bill, does your looking at wheel sets have anything to do with your other topic question about replacing the trucks on your tender?
What wheel sets have you checked out?  I have used Kadee, P2K and Intermountain (both 33" and 36")  successfully.
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: billgiannelli on December 14, 2015, 01:01:53 PM
yes it does!
Thanks for the info!
Bill
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: jbrock27 on December 14, 2015, 01:17:08 PM
You're welcome Bill.

EZ to find:

http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/truck.htm

Thanks for jogging my memory Zeph :D  Only ever got the 110s (for the Kadee ones anyway).  Don't recall that as part of the descriptions for the P2ks or Intermountains.
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: electrical whiz kid on December 15, 2015, 08:24:35 AM
Tender trucks will, by prototype practice, vary in type, size, as well as appearance.  I have "built" several tenders using Bachmann parts, as well as brass parts, and truck type; for instance, I have used 'drop-frame express trucks' on some of my tenders.  The one thing I will recommend is to use the same preparatory care that you would use on other trucks; by this I mean, check your wheelsets, if you have plastic trucks, use that wheel tool to clean up the axle bearing area, then use graphite, or another type pf dry lube.  I use graphite.  Also, if the tender is equipped with  plastic wheelsets, my advice is to lose them and get metal-your choice of mfgr-wheels.  If the tender has electrical connections (most do), then ensure the continuity is good.

Rich C.
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: Hunt on December 19, 2015, 05:40:46 PM
Quote from: TwinZephyr on December 14, 2015, 09:03:33 AM
Code 100 is a rail size.
Code 110 is a wheel tread size.

Wheel Code is Wheel Width in thousandths of an inch. Wheel Tread Width (size) is a different measurement.

Wheel Code 110 represents a wheel width of 0.110 inch

Click Here  (http://www.nmra.org/sites/default/files/standards/sandrp/pdf/S-4.2%202015.01.19.pdf)  for PDF of the NMRA Standard S-4.2
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: jbrock27 on December 19, 2015, 09:54:28 PM
Why?  Was the Kadee link not enough, that shows the difference between Code 110 and Code 88 wheel widths ???
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: electrical whiz kid on December 20, 2015, 07:53:39 AM
Jim;
Regarding those "88" wheels.  I have used the 'prototype" wheels, and am not crazy about them.  They look good, and to the manufacturer's credit, are very accurate.  But, I would rather the security of RP-25 or the like.  I know that I probably won;t have to  fish a train our of a tunnel because of those wheels derailing on my "expertly done" track.  How have you fared with them, or do you use them?

Rich C.
Title: Re: code 100 vs 110
Post by: jbrock27 on December 20, 2015, 08:03:21 AM
Me neither.  When I have bought Kadees, I have stuck with the 110s.  They allow for running on a wider variance of track than 88s.  I like all RP-25 wheels in general over non RP-25 wheels.  It's the way to go.