News:

Please read the Forum Code of Conduct   >>Click Here <<

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - ben_not_benny

#16
General Discussion / Re: ez command
March 23, 2007, 07:01:51 PM
Yes, just use conventional wires.
#17
General Discussion / Re: Name That Locomotive Game
March 23, 2007, 07:00:28 PM
Quote from: Dr EMD on March 23, 2007, 06:51:38 PM
Wait a minute!
This one was never attempted by anyone.
Someone jumped the line!

Quote from: Seasaltchap on March 21, 2007, 12:31:10 AM

This is an easy one.

Clue : In 1960 it was the longest serving Class on British Rail.

© Peter Strange 1989

Please give non-UK types an opportunity to respond.




Who can tell what that train is?
#18
N / Re: Mckinley Explorer coupling
March 22, 2007, 07:46:11 PM
Are you using the 11.25" radius track supplied with the set?

I suggest that you run passenger cars on at least 15" or larger curves. This way, the cars are less likely to derail and uncouple.

Also, be sure to check your coupler height.
#19
N / Re: New 4-8-4 Class J
March 22, 2007, 07:41:53 PM
The Class J may require some break-in, it's probably baused by the motor.
#20
N / Re: N scale in the open
March 21, 2007, 08:14:19 PM
My suggestion is no, because anything bigger than a pine needle will cause trouble for N scale equipment.
#21
General Discussion / Re: Name That Locomotive Game
March 13, 2007, 10:59:37 PM
Quote from: Alex V. on March 13, 2007, 09:07:05 PM
Is it a C44-9W  ???

No, C44-9W's have 6-wheel trucks, along with a two-piece windshield.

Here's a C44-9W:



Quote from: Guilford Guy on March 13, 2007, 10:00:16 PM
MLW M420 ?

You got it, it's a MLW M-420(W).
#22
General Discussion / Re: Name That Locomotive Game
March 13, 2007, 06:02:31 PM
#23
N / Re: parts diagrams?
March 12, 2007, 08:55:37 PM
Call the service department, they can fax you a copy.
#24
N / Re: Spectrum 2-8-0 Turning radius
March 10, 2007, 04:03:45 PM
9.75" at the least.
#25
I would also expect to see a string of container cars with wings coupled behind the DDFJ40AX.
#26
United Pacific... cool.
#27
Quote from: atlanticcentral on February 10, 2007, 10:05:19 AM
Current Score:

Still holding at about the same percentages

DCC  45%

DC    55%

With about 15% of the DC crowd interested in computerized block control.


I recently built a single-oval N scale layout that uses gravity as the power source. I built the benchwork so that it can be tilted a little in all directions with a finger. I also made two very free-rolling dummy locos from Atlas parts. I installed locks on the track that can open or close to prevent runaway cars and hold them. The entire project was done in a week and it was the cheapest layout I've built yet, since it required no power pack and powered locomotives.
#28
N / Re: When did the forum change over??
March 08, 2007, 04:21:55 PM
Only 25% of modelers are N scalers, while HO scale takes 50%. It does make sense.

N scale is pretty popular, given that it has only been 40 years in the industry.
#29
N / Re: Bad Engine?
March 07, 2007, 11:12:42 PM
Locomotives like the 4-8-4 should hardly break down, unless they're improperly handled.

How do you usually store them?
#30
N / Re: Rapido couplers
March 07, 2007, 11:06:35 PM
Quote from: Wesley on March 07, 2007, 02:58:32 PM
Does anyone have anything good to say about rapido couplings ?

Rapidos are the first N scale coupler to be widely used in the industry. It was used as standard before the knuckle coupler. Too bad Micro-Trains couplers can't be widely used by other firms because of patent issues.

I suggest you buy equipment with knuckle couplers pre-installed, this way you won't go through all this headache.