Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2019, 07:36:00 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Please read the Forum Code of Conduct   >>Click Here <<
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 130 131 [132] 133 134 ... 171
1966  Discussion Boards / General Discussion / Re: Chuggington DCC on: January 07, 2015, 01:53:15 PM
I checked the on-line exploded diagrams on the "Reference" page, and Brewster, Koko, and Wilson are all DCC Ready, with an 8-pin dummy plug installed out of the package. It looks like the all use the same chassis.

This is the light board and dummy plug common to all three on the parts page:

1967  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: HO Steam Loco Driver Size on: January 07, 2015, 12:58:33 PM
These are the Bachmann Spectrum 4-6-0 w/63" Drivers if you go looking for them at shows, or on eBay:

84902 - Painted, Unlettered w/Sound & DCC
84906  - C&NW #238 w/Sound & DCC
84907 - NYC #1233 w/Sound & DCC

2-6-0 Moguls had either 56" or 64" drivers, the Bachmann Spectrum 2-6-0 has 56" drivers. If you can find one, IHC did a 64" driver version in their 'Premier' line that was DCC ready. The tender frame also had "grill" work in the bottom for installing a speaker if you added sound. I'm not sure what the driver size was on the Mantua version of the Mogul.


1968  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: E-Z track turnout wiring on: January 07, 2015, 10:42:30 AM
I can tell you from personal experience, these work quite well:

Unless you want the extra contacts for signal lights, you only need a SPDT Momentary On-Off-On switch, not a DPDT.

Tie all the center wires (common) together and connect to one side of your power supply. The outside wires go to the outer connectors on the SPDT switch. The switch center connectors can be "daisy chained" together, and connect to the other side of the power supply.

1969  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: Prototype for the C&NW 4-6-0? on: January 07, 2015, 09:00:43 AM
Two different locos, with some number overlap going on.

The coal burning #239 was built for CSPM&O, as a Class G-1. It was reclassed as an R-1 when it came under C&NW.

The oil burning #239 is a Class K-1, built for C&NW after the coal burner was scrapped.

1970  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: Prototype for the C&NW 4-6-0? on: January 06, 2015, 09:05:55 PM
Couldn't find #237, but here's the #239, same markings you describe for the #237:

Larger version at:

1971  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: Bachmann ez track auto crossing gate on: January 06, 2015, 08:35:08 PM
There's nothing listed on the "Order Parts" page. Your best bet is to call the Parts Dept. and ask if they have one.

Contact #: 1-800-356-3910, ext 328 or 329, be prepared for long hold times.

If it's not available, short of replacing the whole crossing gate, you might be able to make a replacement using thin Bass Wood or sheet styrene.

1972  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: options for HO 4x8 track and wiring plans in DC operation on: January 06, 2015, 08:25:31 PM
No need to tear any switches out to install fixed decoders. The DS64, or equivalent just replaces the switch controller. You can use the switch wiring already in place.

1973  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: How to keep track of switch direction on DCC layout? on: January 06, 2015, 06:48:44 PM
Unless there are contacts for controlling indicator lights built into the switch the instructions don't talk about, there's not a lot of options.

You might be able to use the manual throw lever to bump micro-switches controlling indicator lights on a control panel. Or possibly link it to a modified manual switch stand with built in contacts to control indicator lights. Something like:

1974  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: options for HO 4x8 track and wiring plans in DC operation on: January 06, 2015, 05:46:50 PM
HO EZ-Track is cd100. Cd100 is probably best for equipment from the 70's, a lot of it had huge flanges, if you don't want to change out the wheels.

Most layout plans from that era use "Common Rail" wiring, where only one rail is gapped for creating electrical blocks. If you know you'll be upgrading to DCC down the road, still put in the blocks, but gap both rails. This makes it much easier to set up power districts, and troubleshoot problems, when you finally switch to DCC. Just turn all the blocks on when using DCC.

Other than turnouts/crossovers with decoders built into them, track doesn't care if your running DC or DCC. And even standard remote turnouts can be operated with DCC by adding 'fixed' decoders to operate them, for example the Digitrax DS64. There are several others.

1975  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: options for HO 4x8 track and wiring plans in DC operation on: January 06, 2015, 11:56:07 AM
Which track system to use depends on a lot of factors. How big a layout do you plan to build? Will it be temporary or permanent? Will mainly be running "through" trains, or doing a lot of switching? Will you be looking for crossovers between parallel tracks with fairly close spacing, e.g., 2.5" - 3"? Do you want to have parallel sidings with fairly close spacing to the mainline? Do you plan on having yard tracks that aren't elevated on seperate roadbeds like mainline track? Do you have older equipment with "pizza cutter" flanges that require code 100 rail? Or newer stuff with RP25 contour wheels that can handle code 83, or even 70, with no problems?

The close spaced parallel tracks and siding is an issue, because none of the built in roadbed track system turnouts are designed for that. Even the Atlas Tru-Track roadbed system forces you to use the 1/3 curve section in the "match the curve" mode, and not flipped around to create a close spaced parallel track. Or removed completely for creating a crossover between close parallel mainlines.

I would say look at some track plan books, and once you have a better idea of what you want to do, then decide on a track system.

1976  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: turnouts on ho track power both sides on: January 06, 2015, 06:30:35 AM
"Outside influence" = Scenary pin dropped across the track; setting a Kadee #205 metal coupler height gauge on the track with power applied; etc.

1977  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: options for HO 4x8 track and wiring plans in DC operation on: January 06, 2015, 12:11:22 AM
Considering there's a reason brass track hasn't been made in over 20 years for a reason, yeah, go with nickle silver. Way less work to maintain, and locos don't stall because green gunk is growing on the rails.

I'd suggest pulling the rails out of the brass track and recycling the plastic ties and brass. Or check with your local scrap dealer if you've got a lot. Depending on what part of the country your in, scrap brass is going for $0.85 - $1.55/lb for under 50 lbs.

1978  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: EZ Track Noise on: January 05, 2015, 09:00:17 PM
Having about half a 25lb bag of plaster left over from a project, I just fill the void under the track with plaster and smooth it off with a plastic spackle spreader. Let it set up overnight, and way less noise in use.

1979  Discussion Boards / General Discussion / Re: Bachmann 4-4-0 model 28306 sound on: January 05, 2015, 07:26:54 PM
The tender body is the same one used in the sound equiped version of this loco. It already has a space for the speaker in the tender. The sound equiped version uses the Bachmann #10066 speaker, available through the "Order Parts" page.

1980  Discussion Boards / HO / Re: Bachmann HO engine #6308 on: January 05, 2015, 07:10:29 PM
Len it is the pancake motor unless it was modified by someone. This locomotive hasn't been made in Canadian National livery since the 1970's.

Ugh! If it's lubed to loosen the motor up, their okay for dragging their own train around in loops. But too much slop in the drive for reliable switching actions with knuckles. Plus one or two extra cars can bog them down.

No CN, but I've swapped some other "ancient", and discontinued, shells I really liked to newer drive mechanisms.

Pages: 1 ... 130 131 [132] 133 134 ... 171
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!